1954 Buick 40 vs. 2012 BMW 320
To start off, 2012 BMW 320 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2012 BMW 320. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 320. (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2012 BMW 320 | |
Make | Buick | BMW |
Model | 40 | 320 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2810 mm |