1954 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | Epica |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4328 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2700 mm |