1954 Buick 40 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 142 kg more than 1954 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: