1954 Buick 40 vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 677 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 40 | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 2 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5279 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1043 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2489 mm |