1954 Buick 70 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 70 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 70 weights approximately 1283 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1954 Buick 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Buick 70 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Buick | Toyota |
| Model | 70 | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5274 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1983 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2320 mm |
