1954 Buick 70 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 70 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1954 Buick 70. (200 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 70 weights approximately 116 kg more than 2010 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 70 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Wrangler. (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Buick 70 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | 70 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5274 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1983 kg | 1867 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2946 mm |