1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1967 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | 62 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2250 mm |
