1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 100 kg more than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 62 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3040 mm |
