1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1972 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1972 Toyota Corolla is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1972 Toyota Corolla. (62 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1972 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1972 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1972 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1954 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2290 mm |