1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 1976 Mazda 616 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 616 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2480 mm |
