1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2460 mm |
