1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (75 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2520 mm |