1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1987 Honda Accord
To start off, 1987 Honda Accord is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1987 Honda Accord | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Accord |
Year Released | 1954 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2610 mm |