1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1988 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1988 Ford Tempo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 895 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1988 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2540 mm |