1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Chrysler TC
To start off, 1990 Chrysler TC is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler TC. (174 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 526 kg more than 1990 Chrysler TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Chrysler TC | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | TC |
Year Released | 1954 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1474 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2370 mm |