1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Fiat Legram
To start off, 1996 Fiat Legram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Legram. (145 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Legram.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1996 Fiat Legram has manual transmission. 1996 Fiat Legram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Fiat Legram | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Legram |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1300 mm |