1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Chrysler Phaeton | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Phaeton |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 475 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3360 mm |
