1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (150 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Cadillac 62 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Cadillac Oldsmobile
Model 62 Cutlass
Year Released 1954 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5423 cc 3135 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 267 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 2000 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 5510 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3290 mm 2720 mm