1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | LMP |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3090 mm |
