1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Honda Fit
To start off, 2001 Honda Fit is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2001 Honda Fit. (85 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2001 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Honda Fit | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Fit |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2410 mm |