1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJR |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2910 mm |