1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz A. (138 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 805 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | A |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2084 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2780 mm |