1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan

To start off, 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan. (212 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1954 Cadillac 62 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan
Make Cadillac Dodge
Model 62 Grand Caravan
Year Released 1954 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5423 cc 3778 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 267 HP 212 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Vehicle Weight 2000 kg 1930 kg
Vehicle Length 5510 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 3290 mm 3040 mm