1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 2003 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2003 Lancia Fulvia. (138 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Lancia Fulvia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2003 Lancia Fulvia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | 62 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2280 mm |