1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada
To start off, 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Because 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Oldsmobile Bravada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 62 | Bravada |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2880 mm |
