1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Outback. (212 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 306 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 62 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1694 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2680 mm |
