1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1954 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2870 mm |
