1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Ford GT
To start off, 2006 Ford GT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford GT (550 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 416 kg more than 2006 Ford GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Ford GT | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | GT |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 550 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1584 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2720 mm |
