1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Epica |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2700 mm |