1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2009 Dodge Durango is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Durango (340 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2009 Dodge Durango.
Because 2009 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3030 mm |
