1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Ford Taurus. (263 HP @ 6251 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 893 kg more than 2009 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Taurus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6251 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2870 mm |