1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 5 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2760 mm |