1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Cube |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2830 mm |