1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 483 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2010 Aston Martin One-77.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1954 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2010 Aston Martin One-77 has manual transmission. 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1954 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Aston Martin |
| Model | 62 | One-77 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5423 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 750 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1630 kg |
