1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour
To start off, 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour (271 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 253 kg more than 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Accord Crosstour |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2797 mm |