1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Nissan Maxima
To start off, 2010 Nissan Maxima is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Maxima (291 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Maxima should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 383 kg more than 2010 Nissan Maxima.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Maxima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Nissan Maxima | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Maxima |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1617 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4841 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1859 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2776 mm |