1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2011 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi TT.
Because 2011 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | TT |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2469 mm |