1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2011 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 611 kg more than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3505 mm |