1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2011 Kia Carnival is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2011 Kia Carnival. (186 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Carnival weights approximately 24 kg more than 1954 Cadillac 62.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Carnival |
Year Released | 1954 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 2656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2024 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2900 mm |