1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 200 kg more than 2012 Acura TL.
Because 2012 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | TL |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2776 mm |