1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 222 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | CTS |
Year Released | 1954 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2880 mm |