1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 559 kg more than 1954 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2559 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3302 mm |