1954 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 501 kg more than 2013 Mazda 6.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 6 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5423 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2790 mm |