1954 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2002 Eagle Talon
To start off, 2002 Eagle Talon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 5,420 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Chrysler Windsor (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Eagle Talon. (209 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Chrysler Windsor should accelerate faster than 2002 Eagle Talon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 480 kg more than 2002 Eagle Talon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Chrysler Windsor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Chrysler Windsor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Chrysler Windsor | 2002 Eagle Talon | |
Make | Chrysler | Eagle |
Model | Windsor | Talon |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5420 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2520 mm |