1954 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1954 Chrysler Windsor. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1954 Chrysler Windsor.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Chrysler Windsor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Chrysler Windsor | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Windsor | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4920 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2891 mm |