1954 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 5,420 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Chrysler Windsor (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (157 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Chrysler Windsor should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 153 kg more than 1954 Chrysler Windsor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Chrysler Windsor | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Windsor | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5420 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 2053 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2789 mm |