1954 Citroen 11 vs. 1980 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1980 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1954 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1954 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 175 kg more than 1954 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Citroen 11 | 1980 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 11 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2830 mm |
