1954 Citroen 11 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1954 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1954 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 325 kg more than 1954 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Citroen 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Citroen 11 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | 11 | Compass |
Year Released | 1954 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2634 mm |