1954 Citroen 2CV vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1954 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1954 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Midge weights approximately 471 kg more than 1954 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Citroen 2CV | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | Midge |
Year Released | 1954 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |