1954 Citroen Traction vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 1959 Volvo 120 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen Traction. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen Traction would be higher. At 2,866 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Citroen Traction is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Citroen Traction (77 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1959 Volvo 120. (76 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Citroen Traction should accelerate faster than 1959 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Citroen Traction weights approximately 405 kg more than 1959 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Citroen Traction, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Citroen Traction | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Traction | 120 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2866 cc | 1580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1510 mm |